Monitoring of Curve Progression in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Using 3-D Ultrasound.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the work described here was to determine whether 3-D ultrasound can provide results comparable to those of conventional X-ray examination in assessing curve progression in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). METHODS: One hundred thirty-six participants with AIS (42 males and 94 females; age range: 10-18 y, mean age: 14.1 ± 1.9 y) with scoliosis of different severity (Cobb angle range: 10º- 85º, mean: of 24.3 ± 14.4º) were included. Each participant underwent biplanar low-dose X-ray EOS and 3-D ultrasound system scanning with the same posture on the same date. Participants underwent the second assessment at routine clinical follow-up. Manual measurements of scoliotic curvature on ultrasound coronal projection images and posterior-anterior radiographs were expressed as the ultrasound curve angle (UCA) and radiographic Cobb angle (RCA), respectively. RCA and UCA increments ≥5º represented a scoliosis progression detected by X-ray assessment and 3-D ultrasound assessment, respectively. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of UCA measurement in detecting scoliosis progression were 0.93 and 0.90, respectively. The negative likelihood ratio of the diagnostic test for scoliosis progression by the 3-D ultrasound imaging system was 0.08. CONCLUSION: The 3-D ultrasound imaging method is a valid technique for detecting coronal curve progression as compared with conventional radiography in follow-up of AIS. Substituting conventional radiography with 3-D ultrasound is effective in reducing the radiation dose to which AIS patients are exposed during their follow-up examinations.

Comparison of ultrasound scanning for scoliosis assessment: Robotic versus manual.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound (US) imaging for scoliosis assessment is challenging for a non-experienced operator. The robotic scanning was developed to follow a spinal curvature with deep learning and apply consistent forces to the patient's back. METHODS: Twenty three scoliosis patients were scanned with US device both, robotically and manually. Two human raters measured each subject's spinous process angles on robotic and manual coronal images. RESULTS: The robotic method showed high intra- (ICC > 0.85) and inter-rater (ICC > 0.77) reliabilities. Compared with the manual method, the robotic approach showed no significant difference (p < 0.05) when measuring coronal deformity angles. The mean absolute deviation for intra-rater analysis lies within an acceptable range from 0 to 5° for the minimum of 86% and maximum 97% of a total number of the measured angles. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that scoliosis deformity angles measured on ultrasound images obtained with robotic scanning are comparable to those obtained by manual scanning.